Wednesday 27 April 2016

CIVIL MANAGEMENT - Identify the vague and imprecise phrases Identify the needless details what might Danish have said to Parekh on the phone if he had spoken to him immediately after this conversation with Amir

Need Answer Sheet of this Question paper, contact
www.mbacasestudyanswers.com
ARAVIND – 09901366442 – 09902787224


CIVIL MANAGEMENT

Case study -1

On the liberalization of Indian economy, an established company had to decide about
entering into collaboration with a foreign company for new construction project.
On one side, thinking that there was no harm in approaching various foreign
companies for the purpose in any case, the management approached a number of
companies; and due to the reputation of the company, two of the most reputed
companies of Europe agreed to enter into collaboration with it.
With properly developed domestic consumers market, demand for housing growing
and eagerness of foreign companies for the entry in Indian market, there were no
bottlenecks from government side in obtaining license for collaboration. At present,
there is only one company in India manufacturing the same products.
The managing director was weighting the difficulties of legal complications, severity
of competition from local construction companies, royalty fees to be paid on one side,
and certain advantages of collaboration on the other, and was vacillating between the
two alternatives.
He would sometime say that we could implement the project with local talent without
any foreign help, and other times plead strongly for collaboration.
In this state of mind, he went abroad and had discussions with prospective
collaborators which were highly encouraging. But coming back somehow the idea of
collaboration was dropped.

Q.1) why did the Managing Director first think of collaboration

1. Profits

2. Prestige

Q. 2) why did the idea of foreign collaboration was dropped according to you.

Q. 3) To what extend does this represent an average Indian decision – making
situation at the policy level.


Case study-2:

Shashi and Rushi are working in the reputed construction company at Mira road
which is striving for excellence by keeping it self abreast of the developments in
endlessly changing scenario.
The functioning of one department headed by Shashi was adversely affected because
of his traditional style of management. The subordinates were dissatisfied with the
job and were frustrated and depressed.
The labour turnover rate was very high and there was increase in the absenteeism.
The subordinate’s complaints were received by the management. The subordinates
had to take shelter of the union to take the complaints to the management.
The management was disturbed and was looking for a proper substitute and Rushi
was identified for the purpose. His acceptability and credibility have been the highest
in order.
Rushi was reluctant to accept the new assignment. Man always prefers status quo and
Rushi was no exception. However, Rushi had to move into the department.
He could overcome the initial difficulties with his sincere efforts. The subordinates
were given free hand in setting time bound goals for themselves. A very cordial and
harmonious atmosphere was created in the department under Rushi which paved a
way in improving the climate and culture of the organization.

Q.4) you are required to identify problems involved in the case.

Q.5) What in your opinion could be the cause for replacement of Shashi and the
secret of the success of Rushi in so called difficult department?

Q.6)Do you agree with statement that ‘a true manager should know the art of
managing his people?


CASE STUDY-3

Emotion and Clarity
The dispatch section supervisor, Amir, about forty-five years old, rather garrulous,
and thinking well of himself, just got off the phone, shrugged in mock despair and
pulled a face. He had been trying to get in a word with a customer who was obviously
monopolizing the talk. He stomped into the next room where Danish, his assistant
was checking the day’s schedule of dispatches. Danish is about twenty – seven,
attentive to his work and speaks very little. Here is what Amir said to Danish.
“You know Danish; we’ve had this Parekh account since 1996. He’s always been a
problem customer – placing orders at the last minute and expecting us to get him his
goods in record time. He gives me a headache; I just got off the phone with him. It
took me half an hour just to get in a word edge – ways. I feel like taking early
retirement and getting into one of those multilevel marketing businesses. It seems a
lot easier than all this. I hope you’ll do something about this Parekh. I’ll check back
with you tomorrow.

Next day:
Amir: Danish, how did it work out? Did you straighten out the matter with Parekh?

Danish (puzzled): Huh? What did you want me to do?

Amir (exploding): You mean after all that I told you yesterday, you didn’t do
anything? You’re getting as difficult as Parekh! Stop playing games and just get it
done! Danish (more puzzled): Sure.
And he went off to the dispatch room to see how he could expedite Parekh’s order.

Q.7) Identify the vague and imprecise phrases.

Q.8) Identify the needless details.

Q.9) what might Danish have said to Parekh on the phone if he had spoken to him
immediately after this conversation with Amir?


Q.10) how can you make the communication more productive? 


ARAVIND – 09901366442 – 09902787224









No comments:

Post a Comment